During the pandemic, we all got used to conducting usability testing remotely, either by using Zoom or another collaborative meeting platform or using one of the remote testing platforms like UserTesting. Once the pandemic was over, many of us have continued to use remote moderated usability testing for all the benefits that derive from this approach to learning about your users’ experience in real time. If you are considering this research approach, this primer gives you tips and techniques for conducting remote moderated usability testing so that you can put this technique into action to build user experience into your development cycle.
Remote moderated usability testing is a testing technique in which you meet your participant in real-time but not in the same place. You engage your participant in typical tasks using your product (software, website, mobile device, app) and ask them to think out loud so that you can understand what they are thinking as they do the tasks. You then interview them in a semi-structured interview format to gain insights into their experience, both the things that worked well and the things that did not.
Anytime is a good time to conduct remote moderated usability testing, and the more often you do it during product development, the better. Designing products with user experience built in is called an “iterative design” process, which means that you respond to the results of usability testing throughout the design and development process, making the product a reflection of good user experience. Testing early at the prototype stage or focusing on a single feature is a great use of remote moderated usability testing. But it’s also effective to conduct remote moderated usability testing for current products and even competitor’s products to gain insights that support customer requirements for the next version or release of your product.
So many tools (most of them free for first-time or limited use) support your ability to conduct remote moderated usability testing.
Remote moderated usability testing doesn’t take the time or cost of in-person, in-the-same-place moderated usability testing, but it still requires planning to go off well.
Here’s what you need to know to plan for success:
Remote unmoderated usability testing is conducted without a moderator, making it asynchrononous, meaning that the test session can happen whenever the participant is available because there is no moderator needed. The deliverable is the recording, which you and your team can review afterward.
In contrast, remote moderated usability testing is synchronous, meaning that the participant and the moderator are in the testing session together at the same time. Because remote moderated testing allows for engagement of the moderator with the participant while they are performing the tasks in the study, it provides the opportunity for the moderator to probe for insights based on observations and to ask questions “off script” from the moderator’s guide, as the situation presents itself.
Remote unmoderated testing does not provide for this interaction, but the advantage to remote unmoderated testing is that it can happen at any time without the requirement of coordinating schedules with participants and moderators. Several software platforms provide the tools for conducting remote unmoderated usability testing, which include fast recruiting from the platform’s panel of potential participants and fast setup of the study specifics using the platform’s tools.
Platforms such as UserTesting and Lookback generally require a monthly (or annual) fee (although some allow for a free trial). If this approach fits your user research goals, you can use one of these platforms to get quick insights into user experience about a feature or task on one or more platforms, such as a laptop and a mobile device. If you don’t get a definitive answer to a research question, you can set up another study just as fast to dig deeper or learn from a wider pool of users. You can also get a much larger number of sessions conducted in a short period of time if you want to produce quantitative findings.
Keep in mind that testing sessions are typically short, usually around 20 minutes. And there is a risk that some test participants in the panel may not be a good match for the limited number of screener questions you can ask.
It comes down to what best fits your situation.
Moderated remote usability testing has the advantage of engagement with your participants and the flexibility to ask questions in the moment. But it takes time to recruit and schedule participants, not to mention scheduling your time for these sessions.
Unmoderated remote usability testing has the advantage of speed and scale. But you get what you get: a recording of the session without the chance to ask followup questions.
One method is not better than the other. Know what you want to get out of remote usability testing and pick the method that best matches your goals. The main objective is to do usability testing so that you can understand your users and build that knowledge into better user experience.
Carol brings her academic background and years of teaching and research to her work with clients to deliver the best research approaches that have proven to produce practical solutions. Carol’s many publications (6 books and more than 50 articles) have made a substantial contribution to the body of knowledge in the UX field. The 2nd edition of her award-winning handbook Usability Testing Essentials is now available.
We are a small, boutique UX consultancy.
That means you work directly with the top UX experts.
We are with you every step of the way.